Articles | January 23, 2024
In the media, public pension plans are frequently lumped together, often at a national level. They may also be broken out by state, but even that categorization can be inaccurate. As a result, many plans get painted negatively with a broad brush.
An article published in the Winter 2024 issue of PERSist, the newsletter of the National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems (NCPERS), which you can access from this page with their permission, presents data that underscores the importance of analyzing each public plan individually.
While some clearly (and unfortunately) see the public pension plan system collectively as being on borrowed time, most plans have paid benefits for decades (or more) and never missed a benefit payment. That’s why it’s important to read articles about “public pension plan funding” critically and draw your own conclusion based on data for individual plans. Each plan’s individual underlying structure, assumptions and other features can provide insight into the health and funding trajectory of the plan.
Retirement, Compliance, Multiemployer Plans, Public Sector, Healthcare Industry, Higher Education, Architecture Engineering & Construction, Corporate
Retirement, Multiemployer Plans, Public Sector, Architecture Engineering & Construction, Corporate, Higher Education, Healthcare Industry
Retirement, Public Sector, Investment
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice. You are encouraged to discuss the issues raised here with your legal, tax and other advisors before determining how the issues apply to your specific situations.
© 2024 by The Segal Group, Inc.Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy California Residents Sitemap Disclosure of Compensation Required Notices
We use cookies to collect information about how you use segalco.com.
We use this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve our offering to you.